Subjectivity vs. Objectivity


7/31/13   Subjectivity vs. Objectivity
Richard H. von Gremmler


   This is one of the more challenging decision-making conflicts we will ever be exposed to in life, which will always have a significant effect on our everyday preferences. 
   Every evaluation we make will always be emotionally influenced, and even while attempting to make rational decisions, the actual identification between subjectivity and objectivity will be a constant challenge, as the finality will always be governed by our emotional needs.  (Refer to my blog on Emotional Needs).
   This is a tough subject to logically comprehend, since everything we subject ourselves to in life will always be emotionally driven.  And both of these dynamics will be constant and almost always in conflict with one another. 
   Subjectivity will always engage our emotions, whereas, objectivity involves logical reasoning.  The conflicting challenge here is, having the capability with identifying the dynamics of the actual driving force.  And also, which of the two should prevail when making critical decisions?  And the most important element affecting this scenario; not confusing emotional criteria with logical needs and projections.
    It’s extremely complicated with being capable to become subjectively objective, but possible.  Consequently, if we can become acutely aware (Self-awareness), and have excellent perception and adequate control over our emotional world, we could be capable with making emotional decisions logically.
   Having control over our emotions does not imply being capable with manipulating our emotional processes or needs, as this would be logical.     What I’m referring to is, even though while consciously experiencing conflicting emotional influences; having the inner-strength (emotional self-confidence) to make accurate decisions, even though while in conflict with our emotional needs.
   Since emotional needs are the primary dynamics responsible with controlling our emotional and physical behavior, the only means by which to have any control and focus over our actions, would be to discover and eliminate the stress producing situations (stressors) responsible for our needs.  (Refer to my blog on Stress/Anger Conflicts)
   Every emotional characteristic of an individual’s identity (personality) derives from stress related experiences and their consequences.  These experiences begin while in the mother’s womb, and if not adequately understood and monitored, they will accumulate.  This is to say that, an individual’s identity is formed during this period of exposure, with both positive and negative influences, which is dependent on the outcome of these dynamics. 
   Emotional needs originate as a result of the failure with the acceptance and resolution of stressors; with the needs and stress surmounting in conjunction with the stressors avoided. 
   This is where subjectivity and objectivity can become extremely perplexing.  We can be objective about something emotionally demanding, but only when we have evaluated all of the interrelated variables, both logically (objectively) and emotionally (subjectively).  This is when it becomes unequivocally vital, through genuine determination of our goals, without being influenced by internal and external emotional stimuli (needs). 
   What I’m expressing is, regardless of the variables and uncontrollable integrating factors, the projected outcome must be with what is tangible, and not as we may have needs to believe is real.  And this is why Self-awareness is essential.
   It’s imperative to make correct deductions, regardless of the stress, both internally and externally.  An indisputable outcome must always be the resultant, even if there are conflicting input and demands by additional external influential stimuli.
   I’ve observed numerous individuals making attempts with offering support to others with good intentions, which may not have been particularly beneficial for them.  Even though these individuals meant well, their goal was intended to provide immediate gratification.  There’s no emotional reasoning whether their assistance was beneficial later on.
  
  
  
                                        Editing Required


No comments:

Post a Comment