My Analysis on Psycho (Psyche) Analysis
Richard H.
von Gremmler
Throughout my
countless years of studies and personal research; reveals Sigmund Freud to be
one of the foremost prominent theorists; but most importantly, the founder of
psychoanalysis. As with other renowned
theorists such as Jung, Erickson, Piaget, Pavlov, etc.; they were also equally
inspired theorists; contributing significant philosophies that are similarly
congruent and enlightening.
An important aspect
about theories is that, the term implies subjective opinions and
philosophies. And the most important
factor to always take into consideration; there is nothing mystical, or
intellectually required, in order to understand the philosophical world; as
everyone has the potential to become his or her own theorist, regardless of
educational or socio-economic background.
Everything I
comment on in my manuscript reveals my personal philosophies, which will
coincide with other philosophical and psychological dogma, purported by the
erudite academic world, which is quite normal since there is only one
reality. And the readers should always
question and challenge my material; as again, the information is nothing more
than my own personal theories.
I view psychoanalysis
as a process, by which, someone having achieved self-awareness, would be
capable with assisting others with the discovery of their latent desires and
strife from within their unconscious inner-self; whereby illuminating the
genuine reality of his or her true identity (personality). (Refer to my blog on
Consciousness/Subconscious/Unconscious inner-Self)
This phenomenon, the
unconscious inner-Self, has also been referred to as the Psyche, Soul, Self and
other terms, but I will use the term unconscious inner-Self during my writings
for simplification purposes.
My belief is that it
would beneficial for everyone to seek out the hidden forces within his or her
unconscious inner-Self. This would
reveal the genuine inner-feelings and reasons responsible for any anxieties he
or she might be experiencing. Should we
fail to moderate our stress levels, we could eventually reach a point where we
may lose total contact with the world of reality. (Refer to my blog on Stress/Anger Conflicts)
This process would
create additional stress for us, but once we have achieved some progress, the
suffering we had experienced previously will have been relieved to a point of
genuine positive feelings. This
reinforcement will then serve as a stimulus for us to pursue other hidden
garbage that may have haunted us in the past.
We must be
courageous and determined with confronting our demons. The process would require our seeking out
and the willingness to reveal the culprits responsible for our anguish. But unfortunately
for some, they may choose other alternatives; by just existing in the world of
denial, or drowning themselves in mind-altering drugs.
This formidable
undertaking would necessitate the exploration and clarification of the unknown
factors responsible for our emotional upheaval.
This would require retrieving hidden emotional criteria that had been
repressed within the unconscious inner-Self, of which would be totally
inaccessible from conscious observation, except through the assistance of an independent
party possessing self-awareness. What
makes the unconscious inner-Self so intriguing is that, this emotional
criterion is concealed without our knowledge, and cannot be visualized or
logically defined by the conscious mind (consciousness).
There have been a
myriad of theories and speculation presented and examined over the past
centuries regarding this subject, demonstrating extreme subjective disparities
(confusion?). Most scholars will
doggedly adhere to the dogma that everyone has his or her own personal reality,
but this is totally unfounded; as there is only one true and genuine
reality.
The difficulty
arises in that; everyone will rationalize to himself or herself that he or she
feels confident with the examination of his or her emotional world. But in actuality, this will be totally
dependent on the individual’s emotional tolerance level (threshold). Whereby, we may be capable with consciously
accepting and absorbing the reality of some situations, whereas with some of
the more critical issues, we will rebel and deny their actual existence; while
totally distorting the genuine defining factors of the experiences, identifying
with them as we have a need to believe as reality.
This is why most
theorists believe everyone to possess his or her own reality, but this is only
within consciousness, as the genuine reality of circumstances is hidden within
the subconscious or the unconscious inner-Self.
And this is where ego-defense mechanisms (barriers) come into play;
suppressing the lesser stress producing situations (stressors) into our
subconscious, while repressing the more severe stressors, yet without conscious
understanding, which are hidden within our unconscious inner-Self. (Refer to my blog on Ego-Defense Mechanisms)
This transformation
transpires because of our lack of self-awareness and self-confidence when
encountering certain challenges we might find as disturbing and are unable to
cope with. And again, depending on the
severity of the respective stress situation(s) (stressors), we will either
resolve the stressor(s), or we will consciously alter the reality of the
circumstance(s), and if severe enough, we may totally deny the specific
situation even exists!
It’s quite normal
experiencing anxieties when entertaining circumstances that are challenging for
us. But as a result of our ego-defense
mechanisms, which create barriers, we will consciously, yet unintentionally,
deny certain critical stress producing situations, thus avoiding the authentic
defining factors of these situations.
Ego-defense
mechanisms are an innate phenomenon that exists within everyone, which are
intended to protect us from emotional suffering. But unfortunately, whenever we deny the
reality of any stress related situation, regardless of intensity, this will
create many more complications. This
brings a new issue into the equation, guilt.
And as a result of guilt, we will experience additional stress in conjunction
with the stress from the situation we had denied in the first place. (Refer to my blog on Guilt)
Because of our
denial and with the addition of guilt, this will create an emotional void
within our unconscious inner-Self. This
void will establish a phenomenon, whereby, creating emotional needs for support
by which to fulfill this emotional void.
And as we acquire and accumulate more guilt, and because of our denial,
this void increases, whereby, also contributing to the increasing of our
emotional needs! (Refer to my blog on
Emotional Needs)
To simplify,
whenever we are in denial, we are rejecting ourselves. As a result of this self-rejection, we will
experience guilt and are creating an emotional void or empty space within our
unconscious inner-Self. This void
exemplifies our failure with arriving at a realistic conclusion, by accepting
the actuality of respective stress experiences in conjunction with their
resolutions. Because of this infraction,
by our failing to fulfill our own personal emotional world, the only means by which
to complement our emotional void, would be to demand from others for this
fulfillment, thus, through emotional needs.
Therefore, with
emotional needs, we are introducing a new monster; by becoming indoctrinated
becoming conditioned on the dependency of expectations from others. And even though this may appear to serve as a
positive means by which to satisfy our emotional void, this superficial input
will only be temporary, and we will be learning to become emotionally dependent
on the identities (personalities) of others for our salvation. So if we fail to complement our own emotional
world, we will always be dependent on any form of external stimuli that can
contribute to the pseudo temporary fulfillment of our void. (Refer to my blog on Subliminal and Operant
Conditioning)
This pretense may
serve as an immediate comfort zone, but again, only on a temporary basis
though, and this is when we begin deviating from the world of reality. And also, because of ego-defense mechanisms,
this will construct an unrealistic world within our conscious mind
(consciousness). And some of these
denied criteria will be unavailable from conscious observation temporarily, but
with the more severe stress related situations, these may be lost forever!
Therefore, to
reiterate, it’s the stress related criteria we fear and are not capable of
accepting that will be restricted from consciousness, whereby, either
suppressing the reality of the responsible situation(s) into the subconscious,
which will be consciously available from time to time, or repressing the stress
criteria into the unconscious inner-Self, which is always inaccessible from
being consciously experienced, unless through the assistance from an outside
source, such as a therapist or independent friend, of whom MUST possess
self-awareness!
Suppression entails our choosing to ignore or
evade less stressful situations, which will reappear within consciousness
periodically, and will continue in this manner until resolved. With repression, the quandary here is that,
the explanation of the specific situation is repressed into the unconscious
inner-Self, without our acknowledgement or conscious awareness. And this is why we have psychoanalysis;
retrieving the latent demons, which are hidden away, that are responsible for
our misery and suffering.
This unidentifiable
and uncontrollable phenomenon begins from the time we are in our mother’s womb,
up until our present juncture in life.
And this process of indoctrination is established by the positive and/or
negative influences instilled into our emotional world, which formulate our
identities (personalities). And we are
endowed with these properties from our parents, guardians, peers, and anyone
else who may have influenced our destiny in life.
As identified
earlier, all of this hidden garbage must become exposed and examined for
resolution by an independent party such as a therapist or qualified
individual. The key here is that this
party must not have any biases or needs for the treated individual, and above
all else, possess Self-awareness!
What prevails with
most therapists though; they will choose the easy path and identify with those
renowned personalities that they feel comfortable with, and will actually
imitate them. And there are the few, who
will posses the Self-awareness and fortitude to analyze the theories of others,
while creating their own theories, regardless of the popularity of the
respective theorist. The litmus test
here is, since there is only one true and absolute reality, this will be
verified by the confirming agreement by all parties involved.
As for myself, I
have my own hypotheses on this subject; regarding the processes relating to the
positive and effective analysis of the latent dynamics within an individual’s
covert world, the unconscious inner-Self.
Over the past 55
years I have associated with a myriad of professors and graduate students in
the psychology field. As previously
expressed, there are those who have received an academic education in
psychology, where they then may discriminately prefer a specific theorist such
as Freud, Jung or Maslow, etc., whereby practicing their trade in accordance
with the respective philosopher’s theories, rather than questioning them or
discovering their own ideas. And there are
those others, who will experience and understand the depth of various theories,
along with theories of their own. This
is how I function, philosophizing on an eclectic basis, whereby creating my own
theories, which may be congruent with other theorists, or even be in extreme
conflict with the great minds of the past.
Also, it is
imperative for the readers to understand that the psychology field is not a
science, as it pertains to our emotions.
Emotions can never be logically or empirically analyzed through
observation, studies, textbooks, etc., as it is impossible to study and
memorize emotions from books or other similar means. And creating even more confusion for most,
logic and emotions will always be opposing forces, constantly in conflict with
each other. How can we be subjectively
(emotionally) objective (logical), or objectively subjective, impossible!
The science aspect
is only applicable to the psychiatric field, which is essential at times, and
can be utilized in conjunction with the psychology field. But emotional analysis is a separate entity
all of its own. I mention this because,
everyone, regardless of education, socioeconomic background, nationality, etc.,
can become qualified assisting others with exploring their inner-world;
disclosing the true and genuine reality of their identity.
To reemphasize, when
attempting to discover the authenticity of the true and genuine “reality” of
our emotional world, the difficulty arises, in that, we will experience various
thought and emotional processes on a conscious level, but which may be way off
target from reality. And again, because
of our ego-defense mechanisms (barriers), which are involuntary and
undetectable by the conscious mind (consciousness), the actual reality may be
hidden from consciousness, and reside within the subconscious or the
unconscious inner-Self.
I find the
unconscious inner-Self to be the most unique and intriguing phenomenon we will
ever experience during our lifetime. But
investigating this unknown entity is only possible if we are truly interested
and desirous with pursuing the dynamics interacting within the unconscious
inner-Self. As for myself, because of my
relentless extreme duress and fear, I was forced into this latent world of the
unknown. Fortunately for me, I knew
there was something lacking within my thought processes, and there had to be
some answers for resolution.
What makes my
philosophies so unbelievably simple is that, it’s not that I’m intelligent, but
once we’re able to thoroughly understand and experience the emotional depth of
a theory, it becomes reality. And while
I have extensively studied, researched and explored my emotions, I naturally
came across other outside theories identical to my own and others, whereby;
validating that there is only one reality.
And what makes
theorizing (philosophizing) interesting and simple is that; no one has a patent
on reality, since everyone has access to it!
It is impossible to forget reality, but we need to memorize only what is
unreal, except for science and other unemotional subjects. And it’s pretty much impossible for a number
of individuals to come up with the same identical unrealistic theory or
philosophy.
I had questioned
many of my colleagues on this matter, with most of them fearing their own
demons; the reasoning why they were picking up paper credentials in the
psychology field, hoping to relieve their pain and suffering. Unfortunately for them, again, it is
impossible to relieve emotional stress by memorizing theories from research or
textbooks.
When a student is
inundated with numerous subjects and voluminous research, especially if the
contents are way off target, it’s extremely difficult to be able to analyze
every theory to any degree, because of the contradictions and time element. And this drastically restricts the emotional
flexibility because of their cramming, instead of actually learning and
understanding, through challenging each theory in an effort to understand the
genuine depth and reality of theories.
This occurs quite
frequently. While studying and
researching various theories, many students will encounter a theory
(philosophy) that confuses them or creates stress for them. But because of their needs (insecurities) to
appear capable to demonstrate the ability with understanding the intended depth
of a well-known and respected theorist, they will generally rationalize to
themselves and others that, they fully understand the dynamics of the
theories. Since they have no clue as to
what the theory is implying, the only solution is to memorize the theory. Pretty emotional, huh?
This is an extremely
interesting phenomenon; where the studies become so overwhelming, if the
student(s) were to hesitate or allow some spare time to research or examine a
particular philosophy, they might get bogged down with the philosophy actually
triggering and exposing one of their own personal emotional dysfunctions. I have noticed this on numerous occasions,
both while in class, and also with the professionals,
Then there are the
therapists, including uneducated individuals as well, who may have an acute
degree of awareness, yet whose theories (philosophies) do not necessarily
follow one particular theorist or pattern.
These theorists, as with myself, are considered as being eclectic, as
their theories may or may not be congruent (in conflict) with any of the
well-known theorists of the past. The
theories may coincide with some theorists, i.e. Pavlovian, Freudian, Erikson,
etc., but there is no pure absolute with every theory from any one individual
theorist.
The sad thing about
theory acceptance within the academia environment, which is nothing more than
philosophies, some individuals, who have never pursued a formal education, may
reveal excellent and simplistic philosophies that are not acceptable by the
faction of the so-called intellectual (erudite) community. It’s very difficult for extremely overly
educated individuals to be humble (secure) so as to learn from outside of their
click of the so-called elite, and especially if the theorist is considered
illiterate, i.e. non-credentialed.
The key for proper
psychoanalysis is, for therapists first gaining an acute degree of awareness of
their own personal inner-Self. It is of
paramount necessity for them having the capacity with understanding and being
free of most of their emotional inhibitions and emotional needs. The therapists must be capable with feeling
the feelings of the emotions of themselves and others, which the clients
themselves will not even be aware of.
This leads to the assistance with helping individuals bring out
repressed feelings that had been hidden away within the unconscious inner-Self.
If therapists fail
with having a healthy understanding of their own personal feelings, how in the
world could they be capable with getting into the emotional depth of someone
else’s personal world? Therapists will
only be capable with getting into a client’s emotional world, to the depth of
their own personal emotional interactions and Self-awareness.
The desired
resultant for proper psychoanalysis is, for the clients, whom I refer to as
students, learning how to become their own mentors (analysts). It is IMPOSSIBLE to be able to develop
Self-aware on our own. There MUST be an
unbiased party conducting the counseling, who is aware and has no needs for or
from the client. Thus, the instructing
person must have previously successfully achieved Self-awareness. And above all else, therapists must not
attempt to save individuals, but to assist the clients with saving themselves.
There cannot be
genuine Self-psychoanalysis unless we first gain Self-awareness. The purpose for psychoanalysis from someone
other is that, we will ALWAYS prevaricate and lie to ourselves. This is why it is essential for an unbiased
and emotionally qualified individual (not necessarily academically paper
credentialed) to instill and motivate clients to become self-motivated and
self-challenging.
The therapists must
be capable with motivating clients with having the freedom and courage to be
able to challenge and disagree with them, the therapist. The therapists must also be able to control
and manipulate the emotions of the clients.
It is necessary for the client to become dependent on the therapist,
whereby removing the dependency from him or herself. This might seem to be negative, but the
underlying purpose is for the therapists having sufficient control over the
client’s emotions, as again, clients will always lie to themselves in an effort
to hide from the suffering that motivated them to go to the therapist in the
first place. And also of interest, the
client may be lying about something that didn’t even occur. Sometimes clients will do almost anything for
attention. (Refer to my article on
Control and Manipulation)
This might be hard
to appreciate, but most clients will seek out a therapist who is as emotionally
lost as they are. On a conscious level,
the clients may truly believe they want help, but with the unconscious
inner-Self having control over the conscious mind, the ego-defenses will kick-in. With this phenomenon, clients will feel more
comfortable with only the therapists who have not achieved Self-awareness,
unconsciously knowing that the therapist is not capable with uncovering the
stressor situations (stressors) responsible for the anxieties and
suffering. (Refer to my article on
Stress/Anger Conflicts)
This is how
ego-defenses function. The ego-defenses
serve as an emotional blockade. This
prevents the conscious mind from experiencing the stressor situations
responsible for the stress. As a result
of not being consciously capable with identifying the reason(s) responsible for
the anxieties, and depending on the severity of the respective stressor(s), the
actual stressor will be either suppressed into the subconscious, or repressed
into the unconscious.
The conundrum here
though, with this scenario, even though ego-defenses provide individuals with
instant emotional protection, the stress and anxieties will continue to remain,
unless resolved.
It’s sort of a
dammed if you do, damned if you don’t situation. Since stress situations (stressors) create
stress and anxieties, to deny or procrastinate resolving the stressor, the
stress will still be with us. So even
though ego-defenses are designed to protect us from emotional suffering, with
the stressor possibly being hidden from the conscious mind, the stress and
anxieties will continue.
If the stressor is
in the subconscious, the stressor will pop into the conscious mind from time to
time. But if a stressor had been repressed
into the unconscious, the identifying of the specific stressor will be
extremely more difficult bringing to the surface (conscious mind).
As with lying to
ourselves, to reiterate, because of ego-defenses, any stressor we fear facing,
and we’re unable to consciously accept and acknowledge, will be either
suppressed into the subconscious, or repressed into the unconscious. These ego-defense mechanisms (barriers) are
designed to protect us from emotional discomfort, but will actually contribute
to our dilemma. Since, should we fail to
resolve the stressor(s) creating the stress, unfortunately, our protective
ego-defense mechanisms will actually create guilt; adding even more new stress.
The thing I find
adventurous about psychoanalysis or psychotherapy is; no one has a patent or a
guidebook. Every one of us,
individually, is responsible for his or her own emotional mess, regardless of
who may have designed or put us in our predicament. This doesn’t imply that we’re responsible for
attempting to conquer the devastation on our own, but we must have the courage
and desire to admit to ourselves that maybe something could be wrong. Once we reach this point, then we can seek
out assistance from someone we can truly trust, and not be able to manipulate.
Everyone is
qualified to become a philosopher and/or therapist, regardless of his or her
academic background. I also believe the
terms therapy and counseling are condescending and suppressing. It implies that the therapist is superior to
the client. I myself, have used the term
client, but refer to individuals as students, whereby teaching them the
philosophy of psychology. ***********
It seems many
theorists cling to the theories they had studied and memorized from previous
credentialed professionals such as Freud, Jung, Erickson, Maslow, etc., and
without anyone even questioning or challenging their philosophies. What’s really confusing is that, what if most
of the theories are unreal, or possibly even detrimental? It is impossible to truly understand someone
else’s theories, unless they are genuine (reality) and we have a sufficient
degree of awareness in order to be able to understand the emotional depth of
the respective theory. Then and only
then, will we ever be able to determine if a theorist is on target or not; as
again, there is only one reality.
I’ve come across
many individuals in the past who were involved in the psychology field, who
truly thought they believed and understood the theories of past philosophers,
i.e.… Freud, etc. But again, it’s not
possible to understand the depth of any theory purported by others, unless the
philosophies are genuine and we have first achieved Self-awareness.
It is impossible to
understand the depth of someone else’s theories, if we need to memorize
them. An excellent example involves the
students in the psychology field; how can someone memorize something emotional;
impossible! If we are unable to
experience our genuine feelings and need to memorize something emotional, most
likely it’s either unreal or we’re unaware.
And on the flip side, how could we forget what’s real?
One of the greatest
fears therapists will ever encounter, both on conscious and unconscious levels
are, attempting to apply what they have digested throughout their educational
pursuits, while not totally understanding the depth of the various
theories. And the greater the paper
credentials of an individual, the greater the number of theories to memorize,
whereby, the greater the accumulation of junk, thereby, the greater the
potential for greater stress.
Also of interest,
those individuals with lesser or even no paper credentials, more than not, will
look up to the higher credentialed individuals as being superior to them. The phenomenal thing about this is that,
those individual’s having accomplished Self-awareness, and with lesser
credentials, or even no paper credentials at all, will actually be superior to
those with extreme credentials. They will only respect others in this field, to
the degree of their Self-awareness and dynamics; with no relevance on paper
credentials.
As with almost any
career, academia is essential. Following an individual’s education, whether a
bachelor’s degree, masters or doctorate, individuals will enter into their
chosen field applying what they have memorized and retained, in conjunction
with learning on the job.
With the psychology
field, the education stresses theories and research from previous theorists
from both the psychology and psychiatric schools of thought. Psychiatrists are geared toward the
physiological aspect (endogeny), whereas psychologists concentrate on the
external environment (exogeny) affecting an individual.
The psychiatric
field will focus on an individual’s physiological disorders, which I believe can
stem from both internal and/or external stimuli. With the psychology field, the basis for
therapy entails an individual’s past history, which stems from prior classical
conditioning.
Everyone is
psychothymic, meaning everyone is mild manic-depressive. Mood swings affect everyone, and in varying
degrees. It’s when emotional moods go beyond moderation; this is when
individuals become neurotic. And the
degree of the neurosis will depend if or not an individual should pursue
counseling.
Unfortunately, many
individuals will refrain from outside help, mostly because of societal
pressures. Mental illnesses are
considered abnormal, whereby most individuals will hide this secret from
others. And because of barriers
(ego-defenses), many are actually able to hide this secret from
themselves. These individuals are easy
to read though, because of their subliminal expression of their feelings.
With getting back to
a formal education and of great interest, if someone is in the psychology
studies program and has achieved Self-awareness, how could he or she dedicate
an extreme amount of time researching someone else’s research of someone else’s
research, and so on. To put it simply,
how could anyone emotionally experience the research of others if it is just
speculation and guesswork?
This is the problem
with academia in the psychology field today.
It’s impossible to authenticate a theory, unless we have actually lived
and experienced the theory fully. Just
think how many different theories there are that have been examined through
research, and how does anyone really know which one is on target. This is why I have found most research;
absolutely putrefying!
It’s interesting how
many theorists and experimental psychologists have documented their beliefs and
findings through empirical studies and evaluation, and yet, with very few in
agreement with one another. Are they are
trying to glorify themselves by creating a new theory that no one else had ever
thought of.
I have found most
theorists, as being way off target, as again, there is only one reality. How come most of the theorists are in
conflict with one another? Why don’t
they confer with one another to discover the reality of a specific theory for
their own personal growth? Is it their
ego driving them? Are they seeking
answers for their own depressions? Is it
a safe means by which to hide their emotions from others; as why would anyone
challenge a highly academically (erudite) credentialed psychologist who must
know everything about his or her own personal inner-emotions?
Also of great
interest regarding this subject, many scholars will confuse logic with
emotions. This occurs because of their
lack of awareness and the need for a convenient answer. It’s got to be extremely frustrating
attempting to identify with a theory, and when lacking Self-awareness. This is when most academics will rely on
logic views rather than attempting to understand the emotional aspect.
Logic and emotions
will always be in conflict, and the difficulty entails
Understanding the Psyche
The psyche is a very
complex and difficult phenomenon to truly understand. But once we’re able to truly experience our
inner-Self, the dynamics will make a lot of sense; thus our conquering the
simplicity we had lost and hidden from for so many years.
From my own personal
experiences with the Psyche, we must first be capable with feeling how we
genuinely feel about something; the ability to feel how we genuinely feel. We must be capable with emotionally experiencing
reality ourselves, ignoring external influences and, without rationalizing how
we need to feel about something because of emotional discomfort.
Everyone has layers
of barriers (ego-defenses) that are designed to prevent experiencing stressors
and insecurities affecting the conscious mind. These barriers will develop
during our lifetime, and without our knowing, and will accumulate and become
reinforced as we fail to resolve the respective stress issues (stressors).
To ever be able to
regain our sanity, it is imperative to resolve the issues creating our
anxieties, thus eliminating the need for our ego-defenses to activate. Our goal
in life should be attempting to experience our inner-feelings (Psyche) of who
we truly are, and not as we have a need to believe.
Resolving various
stress producing conditions will give us the confidence for us to be able to
delve deeper into our Psyche. And again,
as we break through these various layers of barriers, this will reinforce us to
have the courage to work with other and future issues. And with each level we conquer, we will be
that much more emotionally strengthened to be able to consciously accept future
stressors, and also become more secure with our present existence
(existentialism).
Only the conscious
mind will lie to us; the unconscious never lies. But unfortunately, we’re unable to logically
retrieve what we have repressed into the unconscious. Only someone with an acute degree of
Self-awareness, can achieve assisting with bringing repressed (hidden)
stressors into the conscious mind.
This becomes very
difficult for those therapists dependent on emotional concerns or the income
from the various clients.
50%
COMPLETED
No comments:
Post a Comment